Prediction of Jan-Michael Gambill vs Jarkko Nieminen Head-to-Head, At
Wojtek Kolan
HEAD TO HEAD
J. Gambill vs J. Nieminen

Jan-Michael Gambill
USA
w
w
l
w
l
l
l
l
w
w
1
Win
1
Played
0
Win
48
Age
44
6'3" (191 cm)
Height
6'1" (185 cm)
Ret.
C. Rank
Ret.
33
Best Rank
13
3
Total Titles
2
0
YTD Titles
0
$27.1K
Career Money
$3.2M
Right-Handed
Plays
Left-Handed

Jarkko Nieminen
FIN
w
w
l
l
l
l
l
w
w
w
1
Win
1
Played
0
Win
48
Age
44
6'3" (191 cm)
Height
6'1" (185 cm)
Ret.
C. Rank
Ret.
33
Best Rank
13
3
Total Titles
2
0
YTD Titles
0
$27.1K
Career Money
$3.2M
Right-Handed
Plays
Left-Handed
Head-to-head: Gambill 1 - 0 Nieminen
They have played 3 sets in total, with Jan-Michael Gambill winning 2 and Jarkko Nieminen winning 1. The last match between Jan-Michael Gambill and Jarkko Nieminen was at the Stockholm Open - Stockholm, 25-10-2004, Round: R1, Surface: I.hard, with Draw getting the victory 7-6(5) 3-6 6-2.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Gambill | 1 |
| Nieminen | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R1) Stockholm Open - Stockholm(10-25-04)
Jan-Michael Gambill
7
3
6
Jarkko Nieminen
6
6
2
J. Gambill vs J. Nieminen H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $27,150 | Career Prize Money | $3,231,200 |
| 50.95% (242-233) | Career Total W/L | 58.39% (574-409) |
| 1 | Indoor | 0 |
| 3 | Titles | 12 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
J. Gambill vs J. Nieminen Match Preview:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Jan-Michael Gambill has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Jarkko Nieminen has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Jan-Michael Gambill, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Jarkko Nieminen has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Jan-Michael Gambill has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Jarkko Nieminen has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Jan-Michael Gambill has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/0), with Jarkko Nieminen winning 0% (W/L 0/0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Jan-Michael Gambill has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 55% (W/L 48/39), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 24% (W/L 12/38). Jarkko Nieminen has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 55% (W/L 202/120), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 46% (W/L 27/32).
- Player level: In the last year, Jan-Michael Gambill has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0), where as Jarkko Nieminen has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Jan-Michael Gambill winning 1 times and Jarkko Nieminen being victorious 0 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Jan-Michael Gambill winning 2 and Jarkko Nieminen winning 1.
- The last match between Jan-Michael Gambill and Jarkko Nieminen was at the Stockholm Open - Stockholm, 25-10-2004, Round: R1, Surface: I.hard, with Draw getting the victory 7-6(5) 3-6 6-2.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Jan-Michael Gambill has played against opponents with an average rank of 0 while Jarkko Nieminen has played against players with an average rank of 0.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Jan-Michael Gambill has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Jarkko Nieminen has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Jan-Michael Gambill has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Jarkko Nieminen has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Jan-Michael Gambill vs Jarkko Nieminen Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
J. Gambill vs J. Nieminen H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 1 |
| 16 | Games Won | 14 |
| 0:0:0 | Average Match Time | 0:0:0 |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
2nd Serve Win %: Gambill 0%, Nieminen 0%.
Opp 2nd Serve Pts Won: Gambill 0%, Nieminen 0%.
Break Points Saved %: Gambill 0%, Nieminen 0%.
J. Gambill Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
QF | L | 5-3 ret. | ||
R1 | W | 6-3 3-0 ret. | ||
R2 | W | 6-3 6-4 | ||
R1 | L | 7-6(5) 7-6(6) | ||
R1 | L | 6-2 6-2 | ||
J. Nieminen Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Rubber 4 | W | 6-3 3-6 6-1 7-6(3) | ||
Rubber 1 | W | 7-6(1) 7-5 6-2 | ||
Rubber 1 | W | 6-0 6-0 6-0 | ||
R1 | L | 3-6 7-6(6) 6-4 | ||
Q1 | L | 7-6(3) 6-3 | ||

J. Gambill vs J. Nieminen Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 50.95% (242/233) | YTD Win/Loss | 58.39% (574/409) |
| 51.12% (594/568) | Sets Win/Loss | 55.94% (1408/1109) |
| 51.15% (5876/5612) | Games Win/Loss | 52.41% (12634/11470) |
| 55.22% (148/120) | Hard Win/Loss | 52.49% (158/143) |
| 24.00% (12/38) | Clay Win/Loss | 62.73% (202/120) |
| 52.29% (57/52) | Indoor Hard W/L | 62.13% (187/114) |
| 52.08% (25/23) | Grass Win/Loss | 45.76% (27/32) |
| 0.05 | Aces Per Game | 0.16 |
| 307 | Aces Total | 1850 |
| 0.02 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.1 |
| 88 | Total Double Faults | 1180 |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 449.77 | Average Opponent Rank | 64.79 |
| 56% (1178/2122) | 1st Serve % | 66% (29581/44936) |
| 77% (889/1158) | 1st Serve Win % | 68% (20221/29561) |
| 43% (399/926) | 2nd Serve Win % | 50% (7706/15364) |
| 32% (46/145) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 42% (1744/4112) |
| 33% (620/1882) | Return Points Win % | 38% (16915/44087) |
| 45.76% (27/32) | Slam W/L | 52.68% (59/53) |
| 53.47% (54/47) | Masters W/L | 46.88% (75/85) |
| 33.33% (2/4) | Cups W/L | 80.77% (42/10) |
| 52.69% (137/123) | Main Tour W/L | 56.13% (270/211) |
| 41.46% (17/24) | Challenger W/L | 72.83% (126/47) |
| 62.50% (5/3) | Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 54% (216/403) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 58% (475/820) |
| 41% (24/59) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 60% (93/155) |
| 49% (103/211) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 54% (198/364) |
| 52% (73/141) | Deciding Set Win % | 56% (185/330) |
| 83% (249/207) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 84% (559/472) |
| 16% (249/40) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 15% (559/86) |
| 16% (226/37) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 23% (424/99) |
Other Tennis Predictions Today
08:50 AM 16/11/25
Prediction03:30 PM 16/11/25
Prediction04:30 PM 16/11/25
Prediction02:00 AM 17/11/25
Prediction02:00 AM 17/11/25
Prediction06:50 AM 16/11/25
PredictionTennis Previews & Betting Tips
15 Nov 2025
Carlos Alcaraz vs Felix Auger Aliassime Prediction – ATP Nitto ATP Finals – 15th November 2025 Best Bets
15 Nov 2025
Rebecca Sramkova vs Simona Waltert Prediction – WTA Billie Jean King Cup, PO, Group C – 15th November 2025 Best Bets
15 Nov 2025
Maria Camila Osorio Serrano vs Antonia Ruzic Prediction – WTA Billie Jean King Cup, PO, Group D – 15th November 2025 Best Bets
15 Nov 2025
Prediction Of Auger-Aliassime Vs Minaur H2H, Who Will Win At ATP Nitto Atp Finals 2025?
15 Nov 2025
Prediction Of Alcaraz Vs Auger-Aliassime H2H, Who Will Win At ATP Nitto Atp Finals 2025?
15 Nov 2025
Prediction Of Sinner Vs Minaur H2H, Who Will Win At ATP Nitto Atp Finals 2025?
Top Predictions Today
H2H 5-10
H2H 0-0
Tennis Events This Week
Bergamo Challenger
Italy
Champaign Challenger
United States
Drummondville Challenger
Canada
Kobe Challenger
Japan
Montemar Challenger
Spain
Montevideo Challenger
Uruguay
Soma Bay Challenger
Egypt
Sydney Challenger
Australia
Yokohama Challenger
Japan
M15 Alcala de Henares
Spain
M15 Antalya
Turkey
M15 Azul
Argentina
M15 Bhubaneswar
India
M15 Criciuma
Brazil
M15 Gimcheon
Korea, Rep.
M15 Heraklion
Greece
M15 Kuala Lumpur
Malaysia
M15 Las Palmas de Gran Canaria
Spain
M15 Luanda
Angola
M15 Monastir
Tunisia
M15 Orlando
United States
M15 San Gregorio di Catania
Italy
M15 Sharm ElSheikh
Egypt
M25 Antalya
Turkey
M25 Columbus
United States
M25 Heraklion
Greece
M25 Luanda
Angola
M25 Manama
Bahrain
M25 Monastir
Tunisia
M25 Vale do Lobo
Portugal